WVMetroNews - WV News, Talk and Sports Network
WVMetroNews - WV News, Talk and Sports Network
WVMetroNews - WV News, Talk and Sports Network
Email: Password: Lost Password? | Register
MetroNews Mobile Get Our FREE RSS Feeds!
WVMetroNews - WV News, Talk and Sports Network
Current Jobs!
Tuesday, February 09 2010
WVMetroNews - WV News, Talk and Sports Network
WVMetroNews - WV News, Talk and Sports Network News Sports WVU Sports Outdoors All Access Audio/Video Affiliates Advertising About Jobs Contact Search
02/26/2009
Hoppy Kercheval
Print this story
Hoppy's Commentary For Thursday
Talkine Host Hoppy Kercheval

--Delegate Craig Blair of Berkeley County and Senator Clark Barnes of Randolph County are both Republicans, but they clearly are on opposite sides of the issue of whether West Virginians who get welfare, food stamps and unemployment should be subjected to random drug testing.  They had a spirited debate about it on Talkline Wednesday.  Blair has introduced a testing bill saying it may help people get off drugs, but Barnes argues that the suspicionless tests would be a violation of the individual’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.  Blair got off the most interesting line of the debate when he asked, “Would you pee in a cup for $300?”

--American Federation of Teachers West Virginia and the West Virginia Education Association are the two unions that represent West Virginia school teachers and service workers, and they are also rivals.  The AFT recently passed the WVEA in membership, which is a source of pride for the AFT and a sore spot for the WVEA.  Because it is now the larger group, the AFT says it and not the WVEA should be able to nominate the education representative on the Public Employee Insurance Agency Finance Board.  Currently, the WVEA’s man, Perry Bryant, is the rep on the board, but the AFT wants Bryant out and Joshua Sword in.  The issue is now before the Senate Confirmations Committee.

--It’s all stimulus all the time.  Ask legislators and Gov. Manchin what’s happening this legislative session and they’ll respond, “The stimulus.” Everybody continues to try to figure out exactly how the federal money can and will be spent.  What’s evident so far is that most of the decisions are coming from the executive branch with little legislative control.

--Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin said the list of road projects to be paid for with the stimulus money had just been released when he started hearing from constituents.  Tomblin told me everybody wanted to know why their road is not being paved or fixed.  Tomblin said $211 million doesn’t go as far as you think when you try to divide it up across the state.

--One again, a bill has been introduced at the legislature that would make not wearing a seatbelt a primary offense.  Under current law, you have to wear your seat belt, but you cannot be stopped for not wearing it.  This change would allow the police to pull you over for not buckling up.  This bill always generates some discussion, but typically has little chance of passing.

--Senate Majority Leader Truman Chafin (D-Mingo) says he’s concerned about excessive force within the West Virginia State Police.  During a confirmation hearing yesterday for State Police Superintendent Col. T.S. Pack, Chafin referenced several newspaper articles about allegations of state police brutality and said, “A lot of people are scared of the state police.”  Chafin admonished Pack to make sure he doesn’t have troopers who are trying to be “Rambo.” 

--On an emotional level, President Obama’s speech Wednesday night was rousing, especially when he referenced the letter he received from the school girl who said, “We’re not quitters.”  That should appeal to the determination in each of us.  However, Politico reports Obama listed or mentioned at least 20 different things he wants to do—everything from providing universal health care to curing cancer to overhauling Social Security.  I expect a letter from another bright young student to arrive at the White House soon that says, “Geesh Mr. President, we can’t do everything!”

--Octomom has been offered big money to make a skin flick.  Vivid Entertainment says it will pay Nadya Suleman $1 million and give her family full health care benefits if she will star in a porn film.  Right now, Suleman is depending on the government dole to pay for her and her 14 children so I say she should  make the movie.  At least that way she would be paying her own bills.


User Comments
drug testing for no apparent reason other than to harass welfare recipients is simply vindictive, a huge waste of cash and time AND a violation of fourth amendment rights. you don't get it both ways folks either you think the constitution and it's guarantees are right or you don't. quite frankly many people receive "government assistance" they they don't seem to consider assistance. does delegate blair relish having some 80 year grandmother on food stamps and social security being drug tested? as for the tax dollar thing many many many many many many people who receive food stamps work AND pay taxes.

aft will be very disappointed if they succeed in getting perry bryant removed from the PEIA board. no disrespect josh but perry's voice carries a hell of a lot more weight than yours. he is a good and fair man who is truly interested in making health care reform succeed and work right. he is interested in representing all employees and he does an excellent job.
Where does Big Brother stop? Who pays for expensive drug testing? How about working on the issues to create jobs, education that would eliminate or reduce the need for welfare and employment programs.
Drug testing for certain entitlements is a slippery slope IMO. One day it is for unemployment/foodstamps, the next day for SS. There are also privacy and constitutional issues out the wazoo. The bottom line is it will probably not save money - so why do it?

On the stimulus, the important thing is that it is pumped into the economy ASAP. Building roads, bridges, updating our electrical grid, and extending unemployment benefits to those who have been laid off are all very stimulative IMO.

Police brutality is always a concern, but not just in WV. Sadly, we too often get too many cops who want to be cops for all the wrong reasons. It is a tremendously honorable profession, but not all those serving, unfortunately, live up to the badge. There is no easy answer, but we have to always be aware of the issue and try to make our force better.

Yes, Obama's speech definitely changed the doom and gloom tone of the previous few weeks to a Reaganesque hope and optimism tone. Reagan pledged similar overly-ambitious goals in his early 80s addresses, probably did not meet half his stated goals, but the US people bought in nonetheless and the US economy rebounded. Let's hope the same thing happens this time.

Have a good day.

I see nothing wrong with a random drug screen for people getting a welfare check. Invasion of privacy? Say what?

I am so sorry but I think if you are signed up for government assistance, you wave those rights. It can be made simple, you want this assistance then sign here stating you will take random drug screens.

While we are at it lets put some other restrictions in place. If you are needing public assistance and things are so bad then lets make sure you do without on things other than the basic needs. That means NO cell phone, No cable TV, NO internet, NO cigarettes or tabacoo, NO alcohol, NO ATV's. If things are so bad, get rid of the extra's that I and every other hard working person does without so that we can make ends meet.
If you are receiving assitance in the form of Welfare i.e. our tax dollars, then you should be subjected to Random Drug Test. Almost all venues of work require these for employment. If you are receiving my tax dollars I have to believe you are seeking employment and a failing drug test would; if not reported just continue the benefits.
Delegate Blair's efforts to ween people off their addictions to both drugs and government assistance will involve a lot more innovation than requiring people to pee in a cup.

Senator Barnes makes a valid point regarding the drug testing for welfare recipients, and says he is concerned about government intrusion into private lives. However, he has sponsored several bills, prohibiting handheld cellular phone use while driving, and creating a DNA database for felony offenders, that are counter to his notions of limited government.

Maybe next time CaptainQ gets pulled over for some minor traffic infraction (perhaps not wearing a seatbelt, or talking on a cell phone while driving?), he should be given a field sobriety test, and strip searched... After all, if he's innocent, why should he object??
So Hoppy, more commentary al a carte? I like it!

- Delegate Blair does have a point. Don't we as taxpayers have a right to know that OUR taxpayer funds are not being spent on drugs? Besides, if your innocent, why would you have a problem with drug testing?

- It's funny that the AFT and WVEA are now fighting. MAYBE they won't be able to gang up on the Governor and FORCE him (through their legislature allies) into passing a HUGE payraise the state can't afford. (We can only hope)

- Just how will Charleston spend the 1.8 billion dollar sliver WV gets from the 1 TRILLION dollar stimulus? Fear not, if anyone in the Mountain State knows how to SPEND cash, it's OUR LAWMAKERS!

- Note to Earl Ray Tomblin: By the time EVERY road project in WV is completed, cars will be replaced by George Jetson style jetcars so we won't need them anymore.

- Correct call on the seat belt law. This, just like REAL ATM law reform, reinstating the death penalty, referendum & recall, will NEVER happen in WV as long as the Democratic Party machine remains in power.

- Maybe we don't need "Rambo" state troopers, Mr. Chafin, but a few Burford Pussers (from Walking Tall) would be a welcome change.

- Yes, Obama's speech was impressive. Too bad it lacked real substance. Isn't it interesting how every time Obama has a major speech, the stock market plunges. I wonder why that is?

- I am SO sick and tired of hearing about Nadya Suleman and her now 14 kids. The lady's a lot like Obama's stimulus package: spending money she can't afford doing something she shouldn't have done and ending up passing all her expenses on the taxpayers.

Post Your Comments
All comments are moderated before showing up on the site. Comments are only reviewed for inappropriate language and libelous or damaging comments. Read full user policy here.

You must be a registered user to post commments. Please login or register to post a comment.
Click Here to simply send a private email to Hoppy about this article (comments will not be posted on the website).




WVMetroNews